Supreme Court has concluded that lies enjoy First Amendment protection,” Schor observed, “not because of their value, but because the government cannot be trusted with the power to regulate lies.”ģ. Redbirds, Eagles set for regional title games Santos’ lies may have gotten him into hot water with the voters who put him in the House, including members of the New York GOP who wanted him to resign.īut until the indictment, Santos has been able to escape legal accountability. “Their scams divert donations that would probably otherwise support legitimate causes that benefit society in one way or another,” Webber wrote.Īs a scholar of constitutional law, comparative constitutionalism, democracy and authoritarianism, Miguel Schor wrote that the bulk of Santos’ misrepresentations may be protected by the First Amendment. Regardless of what the stakes are in Santos’ case, Webber wrote that fake charities are a serious problem. On an early version of his campaign website, the freshman lawmaker claimed to have founded and run what has been alleged to be a fake nonprofit animal rescue group called Friends of Pets United. Professor Sarah Webber is a nonprofit accounting scholar, and what drew her attention to Santos were reports that he fabricated a charity. Here we spotlight three examples from our archives. about Santos, his ability to lie when the truth was readily available and the resentment such lies breed in voters.

Several scholars have written for The Conversation U.S. “Taken together, the allegations in the indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself,” said U.S. Santos surrendered to federal authorities at a courthouse in suburban Long Island on May 10. Department of Justice has charged Santos with 13 counts of criminal wrongdoing, including fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds and making false statements. Now some of his alleged lies, the ones the public had not previously heard about, are the subject of a federal indictment as the U.S. representative for New York’s 3rd Congressional District has been accused of lying about his education, work history, charitable activity, athletic prowess and even where he lives, among other things. (THE CONVERSATION) Even by today’s low ethical standards for politicians, George Santos is quite exceptional.

The lying game book 3